Adding F functions

[RhB_HJ]

Using the mouse when "cut flex here" is still temperamental. Half the time not in the spot specified. How about positioning the mouse at the correct location and executing the "cut" using an F function?

[Jeff]

Sorry, but I disagree. What's needed is to get the program to execute commands where we tell it to and not at any 'average' or random spot. I haven't had your problem with this particular function, but there are a number of places where the same uncertainty shows up.

[Mike from CT]

Talk about cutting flex track, when we cut a standard curved piece, can we keep the radius attached to both pieces (and the degrees) attached to each piece?

[RhB_HJ]

Sorry, but I disagree. What's needed is to get the program to execute commands where we tell it to and not at any 'average' or random spot. I haven't had your problem with this particular function, but there are a number of places where the same uncertainty shows up.

Perhaps what we need is a "Special AR Mouse". Either that or slow down to follow exactly the prescribed/expected path for that function.    Well when I click I expect it to cut precisely where I click. I know it cant be my mouse, it works perfectly in any of the other programs I use. The F function would be a precise work around, as long as the mouse actually knows where it is when I click.

Reminds me of the "good old days" when using "MS Publisher1" with Win 3.1   

I haven't mentioned the other "random choices" because they are not as aggrevating as the "cut flex here", but that is probably because I work mostly with flex, because it is more flexible. 

[David]

The earlier bug has not been solved correctly for all situations. I'm working on it!

David.